The government’s welfare reform plans are looking increasingly shaky. On the workfare front, Scope are pulling out of Mandatory Work Activity, making them the fourth charity to pull out of the workfare scheme in the last five weeks, after the British Heart Foundation, Age UK and Cancer Research. Boycott Workfare’s campaign against workfare providers has an impressive track record of forcing employers to abandon workfare, and there’s every reason to believe that this kind of sustained pressure will win more victories in future.
Meanwhile, the new Universal Jobmatch site is attracting increasing amounts of press criticism, with the Guardian and Daily Mail following up on Channel 4 News’s excellent expose, which in turn was inspired by Johnny Void’s consistently quality work on the subject. The basic problem with Jobmatch is that it’s designed to spy on claimants in order to find excuses to sanction people, but as well as this basic problem, there’s also the fact that it’s an incredibly badly-designed site, and could very easily be used for identity theft.
The bad publicity is definitely having an effect: for instance, when contacted by the Guardian, the DWP claimed that the scheme was still being piloted before a national rollout, which everyone who’s been inside a jobcentre in the last month or so knows is a lie. This definitely gives claimants who want to resist the scheme a bit more room to move, as it’s unlikely that the DWP will want to risk the potential backlash from sanctioning someone for refusing to sign up to a site that’s so notoriously unsafe. The PCS union are reporting that the scheme is definitely not mandatory. If the humiliating stories continue for a while longer, it’s entirely possible that the DWP will end up ditching Jobmatch entirely and replacing it with something else. But it’s important to keep an eye on what they’re doing: the central problem with Jobmatch is still that it was designed as a tool to cut people’s benefits, and it’s likely that any replacement will have similar features, even if bad press shames them into creating something that works a bit better.
Ultimately, no matter what happens with workfare and Jobmatch, claimants are still likely to carry on facing government attacks of one kind or another. In the long run, the only thing that can protect us is a movement of claimants willing to stick up for each other. Sympathetic news stories can help, but in the end there’s no substitute for the people most directly affected taking action together.
-
Recent Posts
Recommended reading
General resources/misc.
- Anarcha Library
- Anarchist bookfairs
- Anarchist FAQ
- Anarchist Media Project
- Anarcho-Syndicalism 101
- Anarkismo
- Be the media
- Big Flame
- Black Flag Magazine
- Freedom Press
- Ideas & Action
- Kate Sharpley Library
- LabourStart
- Libcom
- Marxists Internet Archive
- Now Or Never
- Occupy Everything for Everyone
- Past Tense
- Platformist archive
- Prole.info
- Recomposition
- Situationist International text library
- Strike Action
- The Anarchist Library
- Zabalaza Books
National groups
Blogroll
- Anarcho-bastard
- Another Angry Woman
- Attempts at Living
- Bastard Octopus
- Burn Shit
- Caiman del Barrio
- Class(room) War
- Consent.me.uk
- Demand Nothing
- Deterritorial Support Group
- Disillusioned Marxist
- Electricians Against the World
- Everybody Hates A Tourist
- For Workers' Power
- Freedom in the 21st
- From the Greek streets
- I am un chien andalusia
- Incubus
- Infantile Disorder
- Intensive Activity
- Jew-venile Delinquent
- Johnny Void
- Lolrevolution
- Magic Zebras
- MC Auter's Musings
- Minor Threat Recordings
- My Arse
- Occupy Everything!
- Pierce Penniless
- Polite Ire
- Poumista
- Property is Theft
- Quacking Plums
- Rebel Cleaners
- Red Star Commando
- Sanction Sabs
- The Great Unrest
- The Master's Tools
- The Peripheries of Anarchy
- The Revolution Will Be Streamed
- Truth-Reason-Liberty
- Uncomradely Behaviour
- While Rome Burns
- Working Class Self-Organisation
Local groups
- Action East End
- All London Anarchist Revolutionary Movement
- Anti-Capitalist Action Manchester
- Anti-Cuts Action Bristol and Bath
- Autonomous Nottingham
- BARF (Bath anarchist group)
- Birmingam Eviction Resistance Network
- Brent Solidarity Group
- Brighton Solidarity Federation
- Bristol AF
- Brum Tenants and Homeless Action Group
- Cambridge Anarchists
- Camden Alarm
- Community Action Lewisham
- Edinburgh Anarchists
- Edinburgh Coalition Against Poverty
- Femcells North London
- Femcells South London
- Glasgow Anarchists
- Glasgow Solidarity Network
- Greenwich Alarm
- Hackney Anarchist Group
- Hackney Solidarity Network
- Haringey Solidarity Group
- Hastings Anarchists
- Hereford Heckler
- Kent Anarchists
- Leicester AF
- Leicestershire Solidarity Group
- Liverpool Solidarity Federation
- London Anarchist Bookfair
- London Coalition Against Poverty
- Manchester (and sometimes Sheffield) bookfair
- Manchester AF
- Norfolk Community Action Group
- North East Anarchists
- Norwich Anarchists
- Nottingham Solidarity Network
- Nottinghamshire Black Arrow
- Radical Islington
- Radical London
- Scottish AF
- Staines Anarchists
- Surrealist London Action Group
- Teeside Solidarity Movement
- The Crutch Collective
- The Fargate Speaker
- The Sparrow's Nest
- Thurrock Heckler
- Tower Hamlets Alarm
- Tyneside Solidarity Group
- Wessex Solidarity
- West London Alarm
- Whitechapel Anarchist Group
- York Anarchists
- Yorkshire AF
Prisoners/Legal Support/Anti-Repression
- Bristol Defendant Solidarity
- Committee Against Political Repression
- Fitwatch
- Glasgow Defence Campaign
- Green & Black Cross
- Leeds Anarchist Black Cross
- Legal Defence & Monitoring Group
- London Anarchist Black Cross
- No to Riot Evictions
- Nottingham Defence Campaign
- Prisoner of War CD
- Support 4 Ed Woollard
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
Categories
- activism
- America
- anarchists
- birmingham
- bit more thinky
- black bloc
- debate
- disability
- france
- gender
- Greece
- Internationalism
- internet
- Ireland
- Israel/Palestine
- Italy
- Korea
- labour
- NUS
- occupations
- police
- protests
- racism
- repression
- riots
- strikes
- students
- stuff that I don't think is very useful
- stuff that I think is pretty awesome
- the left
- the media
- the right
- the spectacle
- the unemployed
- tories
- Uncategorized
Meta
“The basic problem with Jobmatch is that it’s designed to spy on claimants”
http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security-technology-and-liberty/vast-new-spying-program-was-started-secret-bogus
I just went to sign today, and they informed me that the job seekers agreements are being changed in january; making sign up and full participation on universal jobmatch, a condition of receiving benefits. I challenged them on data protection, but the girl was clueless and spouted off the ” party line “. Think i’ll need to seek legal advice about this….
Jesus, that’s terrifying. I’ll be signing on myself today, I’ll see if they say the same thing.
Pingback: Jobmatch, Blacklisting, Grand Jury Resistance: Mid-December round-up | Cautiously pessimistic
I told them that they are forcing me to surrender my data protection rights, and that i’d need legal advice before signing a new JASG. The girl said i’d need to speak with her manager in the new year… I said that’s fine, as i’d need his or her name if i take legal action. I i cluded my email as my name in the last post, could you possily change or remove? ( typing in a rush! )
Yeah, fixed. Could really use some advice about when you should and shouldn’t sign a new agreement, they keep trying to add more and more to mine.
I Wish i knew….. As far as i can see, the agreements are contracts, and both parties need to agree to the change. A threat of financial penalty seems like a contract being signed under duress, and puts them in line for legal action… Especially if they are forcing you to surrender legal protections under data protection laws too….. I’m going to see my local CAB, they usually have a volunteer solicitor who can advise.
Yeah, let me know what they say. If you haven’t seen them already, http://www.donotsign.com and consent.me.uk have some good information, but they seem to be mostly about the Work Programme, not JSA more generally.
Just seen this, which is pretty encouraging: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9757895/Government-to-spy-on-computers-of-the-jobless.html